People v. Martins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Martins

255 A.D.2d 400, 679 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11763

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 400 (People v. Martins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martins, 255 A.D.2d 400, 679 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the [401]*401defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), rendered April 18, 1996, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to his contention, the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). The defendant’s attorney negotiated an advantageous plea agreement that substantially limited the defendant’s exposure to imprisonment (see, People v Mobley, 221 AD2d 376; People v Ladelokun, 192 AD2d 723).

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the [401]*401defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), rendered April 18, 1996, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to his contention, the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). The defendant’s attorney negotiated an advantageous plea agreement that substantially limited the defendant’s exposure to imprisonment (see, People v Mobley, 221 AD2d 376; People v Ladelokun, 192 AD2d 723).

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered. Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 400, 679 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martins-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack