People v. Martinez

129 A.D.3d 1106, 11 N.Y.S.3d 686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2015·No. 2011-00912·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered December 13, 2010, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), attempted assault in the third degree, and criminal trespass in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court rendered February 14, 2012, revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court on December 13, 2010, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a term of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), attempted assault in the third degree, and criminal trespass in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Canole, 123 AD3d 940, 940 [2014]). In any event, the record reflects that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, *1107 543 [1993]). The defendant’s post-plea assertions regarding his innocence contradicted the admissions he made under oath at his plea allocution, and were insufficient to warrant vacatur of his plea or a hearing (see People v Dixon, 29 NY2d 55, 57 [1971]; People v Dazzo, 92 AD3d 796, 796 [2012]; People v Douglas, 83 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2011]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to, sua sponte, order a competency examination (see People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757, 765 [1999]; People v Velez, 64 AD3d 799, 800 [2009]; People v Simpson, 52 AD3d 846, 847 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Rivera, J.R, Skelos, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 129 A.D.3d 1106, 11 N.Y.S.3d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

129 A.D.3d 1106 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Currier
2021 NY Slip Op 00574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Dunkley
2019 NY Slip Op 8211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Caceres
2017 NY Slip Op 8281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Street
2016 NY Slip Op 7224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Maldonado
2016 NY Slip Op 7216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Rodriguez
142 A.D.3d 1189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Upson
134 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)