Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Martinez

People v. Martinez

113 A.D.3d 636, 977 N.Y.2d 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 A.D.3d 677 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 2014·Published

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his plea of guilty was entered voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]). The defendant acknowledged during the plea proceeding that he was aware of the postrelease supervision component of his sentence (see generally People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545-546 [2007]; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 113 A.D.3d 636, 977 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 636 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Fiumefreddo
626 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Catu
825 N.E.2d 1081 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Louree
869 N.E.2d 18 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)