People v. Martinez

121 A.D.3d 471, 993 N.Y.S.2d 499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 A.D.3d 677
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 9, 2014·No. 13152 4266/08·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered December 20, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of *472 course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Although a nurse practitioner’s opinion testimony on the subject of the alleged sexual abuse exceeded the proper bounds of such testimony, the court’s curative actions were sufficient to prevent prejudice, and reversal is not warranted. There is no significant probability that, but for the improper opinion testimony, defendant would have been acquitted (see People v Diaz, 15 NY3d 40, 49 [2010]).

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 121 A.D.3d 471, 993 N.Y.S.2d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 471 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diaz
930 N.E.2d 264 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)