People v. Martinez

27 A.D.3d 665, 810 N.Y.S.2d 686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered April 16, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[666]*666The defendant’s arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are without merit. The challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence (see People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105 [1976]), were responsive to arguments presented in the defense counsel’s summation (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396 [1981]; People v Baker, 251 AD2d 592 [1998]), or were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 27 A.D.3d 665, 810 N.Y.S.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 665 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baston
40 A.D.3d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Prince
36 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)