People v. Martinez

239 A.D.2d 205, 658 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5169
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered April 22, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the court erred in excusing a prospective juror is unpreserved for appellate review since defense counsel made no objection to the juror’s excusal (People v Hopkins, 76 NY2d 872, 873). Were we to review the claim in the interest of justice, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in excusing the prospective juror during the pre-voir dire screening (see, People v Velasco, 77 NY2d 469, 473). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 239 A.D.2d 205, 658 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 205 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toussaint
40 A.D.3d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Suarez
262 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Coleman
262 A.D.2d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)