People v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Martinez

54 A.D.2d 879, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14670

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 879 (People v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martinez, 54 A.D.2d 879, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

— On this appeal from a judgment, rendered on May 8, 1974, in the Supreme Court, New York County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree and sentencing him to the custody of the Drug Addiction Control Commission for an indeterminate period not to exceed 60 months, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833; see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid appealable issue, and that the appeal is therefore frivolous. After a review of the record and proceedings in this case, this court agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised on this appeal that would not be frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— On this appeal from a judgment, rendered on May 8, 1974, in the Supreme Court, New York County, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree and sentencing him to the custody of the Drug Addiction Control Commission for an indeterminate period not to exceed 60 months, assigned counsel, after conscientiously examining the record has sought leave to withdraw. The application is supported by a brief in compliance with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833; see, also, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Counsel has concluded that the record in this case does not reveal any valid appealable issue, and that the appeal is therefore frivolous. After a review of the record and proceedings in this case, this court agrees with counsel for appellant that there are no issues to be raised on this appeal that would not be frivolous. Accordingly, the application by counsel to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of conviction is unanimously affirmed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 879, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martinez-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack