People v. Martin

2017 NY Slip Op 8451, 155 A.D.3d 589, 63 N.Y.S.3d 852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 2017·No. 5096 20096/16·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Tandra L. Dawson, J.), rendered July 13, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of menacing in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of seven months, unanimously affirmed.

The accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally sound because it contained nonconclusory factual allegations that, if assumed to be true, established each element of second-degree menacing and provided reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed that crime (see People v Jackson, 18 NY3d 738 [2012]; People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100 [2010]). The fact that the firsthand account contained in the victim’s supporting deposition corrected some minor inaccuracies contained in a detective’s secondhand supporting deposition did not create any jurisdictional defect.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martin, 2017 NY Slip Op 8451, 155 A.D.3d 589, 63 N.Y.S.3d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8451 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson-McLean (Kimone)
145 N.Y.S.3d 284 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)