People v. Martin

2017 NY Slip Op 1468, 147 A.D.3d 659, 46 N.Y.S.3d 883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.3d 981
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 2017·No. 3204 30080/13·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James M. Burke, J.), entered June 17, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant could not have been prejudiced by the court’s denial of his request for an adjournment for the purpose of obtaining additional information about his health, because the court expressly stated that it accepted as true defense counsel’s description of defendant’s medical condition and the content of the documentation counsel sought to provide, but that it did not consider defendant’s medical condition a sufficient basis for a downward departure under all the circumstances. Accordingly, we find that a remand for a new proceeding is not warranted.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martin, 2017 NY Slip Op 1468, 147 A.D.3d 659, 46 N.Y.S.3d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1468 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.