People v. Martin

285 A.D.2d 614, 729 N.Y.S.2d 491, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 271 A.D.2d 459

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered March 8, 1999, convicting him of bail jumping in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[615]*615Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly permitted the prosecution to inquire into the defendant’s court appearances on prior unrelated cases to rebut the defendant’s assertion, in defense to the charge of bail jumping, that he was generally unfamiliar with court procedure (see, People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 248; People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335, 345, cert denied 460 US 1047). The relevance of this rebuttal evidence far outweighed any possible prejudice which might have resulted (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 359-360). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martin, 285 A.D.2d 614, 729 N.Y.S.2d 491, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

285 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ventimiglia
420 N.E.2d 59 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Harris
442 N.E.2d 1205 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Alvino
519 N.E.2d 808 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)