People v. Martin

240 A.D.2d 595, 659 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 568

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered November 6, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s argument that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because, among other things, trial counsel failed to make a pretrial motion to sever the offenses. The defendant’s trial counsel provided him with meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Jefferson, 156 AD2d 716).

Furthermore, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Joy, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martin, 240 A.D.2d 595, 659 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 595 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Jefferson
156 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)