People v. Martin

145 A.D.2d 976, 538 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14067
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 A.D.2d 355

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence of defendant’s guilt of sodomy, attempted sodomy, rape, and attempted rape came from the testimony of the victim, the 15-year-old cousin of defendant. Obviously, the jury credited her testimony. " 'Weighing] the relative probative force of conflicting testimony’ ”, including any inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony " 'and the relative strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony’ ” (People ex rel. MacCracken v Miller, 291 NY 55, 62, quoted in People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), we conclude that the jury’s verdict was supported by the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martin, 145 A.D.2d 976, 538 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

145 A.D.2d 976 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. Miller
50 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)