People v. Martin

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Martin

419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 925, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2160

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 N.E.2d 346 (People v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martin, 419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 925, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2160 (N.Y. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. In this case, in which the Appellate Division affirmed the findings made by the suppression court, we cannot say as a matter of law that probable cause to enter the apartment and to conduct a search was not established. As to the sentencing issue raised by the defendant, no question of law was preserved for our review.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. In this case, in which the Appellate Division affirmed the findings made by the suppression court, we cannot say as a matter of law that probable cause to enter the apartment and to conduct a search was not established. As to the sentencing issue raised by the defendant, no question of law was preserved for our review.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 N.E.2d 346, 52 N.Y.2d 925, 437 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martin-ny-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack