People v. Martin

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Martin

207 N.E.2d 197, 15 N.Y.2d 933, 259 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1514

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 207 N.E.2d 197 (People v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martin, 207 N.E.2d 197, 15 N.Y.2d 933, 259 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1514 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergah. Chief Judge Desmohd and Judges Dye and Full dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the information upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the conviction of defendants of the crime of disorderly conduct in violation of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 722 of the Penal Law. (People v. Perry, 265 N. Y. 362; People v. Chesnick, 302 N. Y. 58; People v. Carcel, 3 N Y 2d 327.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergah. Chief Judge Desmohd and Judges Dye and Full dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the information upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant the conviction of defendants of the crime of disorderly conduct in violation of subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 722 of the Penal Law. (People v. Perry, 265 N. Y. 362; People v. Chesnick, 302 N. Y. 58; People v. Carcel, 3 N Y 2d 327.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 N.E.2d 197, 15 N.Y.2d 933, 259 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martin-ny-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack