People v. Martin
This text of 6 Cal. 477 (People v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
[478]*478That the record in this case is so full of errors as to warrant an immediate reversal, is admitted by the Attorney General, provided this Court can take notice of the bill of exceptions, which was not signed by the Judge of the Court below within ten days after the trial.
In the absence of anything appearing to the contrary, the legal intendment would arise from the fact of the bill being signed by the Judge, that the same was done regularly. In fact, it is difficult to sec how the failure or refusal to sign a bill of exceptions could defeat the party’s right of appeal.
On examination, it will be found that no analogy whatever exists between this case and the one of Leech v. Allen. 2 Cal., 95.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martin-cal-1856.