People v. Martell

195 A.D.2d 526, 601 N.Y.S.2d 829

This text of 195 A.D.2d 526 (People v. Martell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Martell, 195 A.D.2d 526, 601 N.Y.S.2d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered June 2, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate challenges to the procedures utilized in determining and imposing sentence are forfeited if they are not raised in a timely manner before the trial court (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 281). Therefore, we need not reach the defendant’s contention with respect to restitution.

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 526, 601 N.Y.S.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martell-nyappdiv-1993.