People v. Martel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Martel

90 A.D.3d 471, 935 N.Y.2d 266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.3d 471 (People v. Martel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martel, 90 A.D.3d 471, 935 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from [472]*472be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from [472]*472be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.3d 471, 935 N.Y.2d 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martel-nyappdiv-2011.