People v. Marte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Marte

135 A.D.3d 581, 22 N.Y.S.3d 858

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2016·No. 16710 2377N/12·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been *582 taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered June 17, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been *582 taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered June 17, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.

People v. Marte, 135 A.D.3d 581, 22 N.Y.S.3d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

135 A.D.3d 581 (People v. Marte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.