People v. Marshall
104 A.D.3d 707, 960 N.Y.S.2d 321
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Marshall. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 A.D.3d 840 →
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed May 31, 2011, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Marshall, 104 A.D.3d 707, 960 N.Y.S.2d 321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
104 A.D.3d 707 (People v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)