People v. Marshall-Gibson

196 N.Y.S.3d 791, 220 A.D.3d 809, 2023 NY Slip Op 05152
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 2023
DocketInd. No. 2133/18
StatusPublished

This text of 196 N.Y.S.3d 791 (People v. Marshall-Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Marshall-Gibson, 196 N.Y.S.3d 791, 220 A.D.3d 809, 2023 NY Slip Op 05152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Marshall-Gibson (2023 NY Slip Op 05152)
People v Marshall-Gibson
2023 NY Slip Op 05152
Decided on October 11, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 11, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LARA J. GENOVESI
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

2020-07339
(Ind. No. 2133/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Brian Marshall-Gibson, appellant.


Jan Murphy, Huntington, NY, for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Tammy J. Smiley and Autumn S. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert A. Schwartz, J.), rendered August 24, 2020, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; People v Stevens, 203 AD3d 958). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., MALTESE, GENOVESI and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Stevens
203 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.Y.S.3d 791, 220 A.D.3d 809, 2023 NY Slip Op 05152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marshall-gibson-nyappdiv-2023.