People v. Marsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Marsh

20 A.D.2d 918, 249 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4010

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 918 (People v. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Marsh, 20 A.D.2d 918, 249 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 8, 1963 on their pleas of guilty, convicting each of them of the possession of policy slips (Penal Law, § 975), and: (a) sentencing defendant Marsh to serve a term of six months in the New York City Penitentiary and to pay a fine of $250; and (b) sentencing defendant Bond to serve a term of three months in the City Prison and to pay a fine of $250. The only issue raised is that the sentences imposed were excessive. As to the defendant Marsh: Judgment affirmed. No opinion. As to the defendant Bond: Judgment modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of: (a) striking out the provision imposing the term of three months’ imprisonment; and (b) substituting therefor a provision placing her on probation for a period of three months. As so modified, judgment affirmed as to defendant Bond. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the imposition of a prison term upon the said defendant Bond was unduly severe. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 8, 1963 on their pleas of guilty, convicting each of them of the possession of policy slips (Penal Law, § 975), and: (a) sentencing defendant Marsh to serve a term of six months in the New York City Penitentiary and to pay a fine of $250; and (b) sentencing defendant Bond to serve a term of three months in the City Prison and to pay a fine of $250. The only issue raised is that the sentences imposed were excessive. As to the defendant Marsh: Judgment affirmed. No opinion. As to the defendant Bond: Judgment modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of: (a) striking out the provision imposing the term of three months’ imprisonment; and (b) substituting therefor a provision placing her on probation for a period of three months. As so modified, judgment affirmed as to defendant Bond. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the imposition of a prison term upon the said defendant Bond was unduly severe. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 918, 249 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marsh-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack