People v. Marrero

821 N.E.2d 968, 3 N.Y.3d 762, 788 N.Y.S.2d 663, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 3726
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Upon remitting the matter for resentencing based on the sentencing court having—as a result of the parties’ mutual mistake—adjudicated defendant a second felony offender, the Appellate Division allowed the People to allege a different prior felony conviction as a basis for the adjudication. Citing Matter of Kisloff v Covington (73 NY2d 445, 452 [1989]), the Appellate Division correctly ruled that in the event defendant cannot properly be adjudicated a second felony offender, the People should not be permitted to withdraw their consent to defendant’s guilty plea.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marrero, 821 N.E.2d 968, 3 N.Y.3d 762, 788 N.Y.S.2d 663, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 3726 (N.Y. 2004).

821 N.E.2d 968 (People v. Marrero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nieves-Rojas
126 A.D.3d 1373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Marino
81 A.D.3d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Williams
49 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Assadourian
19 A.D.3d 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)