People v. Marrazzo
This text of 225 A.D.2d 562 (People v. Marrazzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[563]*563We reject the defendant’s contention that the court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of justification pursuant to Penal Law § 35.20. The evidence adduced at trial, when viewed in a light most favorable to the defense (see, People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142; People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299), did not support the defendant’s claim that he shot the victim while the victim was committing or attempting to commit burglary or arson upon his premises (see, Penal Law § 35.20; People v Bertone, 213 AD2d 417; see also, People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either improperly raised on appeal (see, People v O’Connor, 126 AD2d 676), or without merit (see, People v Byrnes, 33 NY2d 343; People v Brooks, 184 AD2d 274). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 562, 639 N.Y.2d 88, 639 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marrazzo-nyappdiv-1996.