People v. Marquez
This text of 73 A.D.3d 1212 (People v. Marquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed January 12, 2009, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict.
Ordered that the resentence is reversed, on the law, the term of postrelease supervision is vacated, and the original sentence imposed May 15, 2002, is reinstated.
As held by the Court of Appeals in People v Williams (14 NY3d 198, 217 [2010]), “the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits a court from resentencing the defendant to the mandatory term of [postrelease supervision] after the defendant has served the determinate term of imprisonment and has been released from confinement.” In accordance with People v Williams, the People correctly concede that the term of postrelease supervision challenged on this appeal must be vacated. Accordingly, the resentence is reversed, the term of postrelease supervision is [1213]*1213vacated, and the original sentence imposed May 15, 2002, is reinstated.
In light of our determination, we do not consider the defendant’s remaining contentions. Rivera, J.P, Florio, Angiolillo and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.3d 1212, 900 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marquez-nyappdiv-2010.