People v. Marnell

106 A.D.2d 906, 483 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21820
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On defendant’s appeal from the judgment of conviction, we have examined all issues preserved for review and find them to be without merit. Any claimed deficiency in the plea allocution was not timely raised at County Court “by motion to vacate or otherwise” and thus is not preserved for review (People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637; cf. People v Sobczak, 105 AD2d 1053). Were we to undertake review, we would hold on this record that defendant’s claim is without merit.

We note, however, that subsequent to the imposition of sentence, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20 to set aside the judgment of conviction. There is no appeal before us from County Court’s order denying that motion. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — murder, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Den-man, Boomer and O’Donnell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marnell, 106 A.D.2d 906, 483 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

106 A.D.2d 906 (People v. Marnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tobie
115 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)