People v. Mark L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mark L.

70 A.D.2d 956, 418 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 956 (People v. Mark L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mark L., 70 A.D.2d 956, 418 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed February 6, 1978, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, upon resentence, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to probation for a period of five years. The case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, (1) to fix the terms and conditions of probation, which shall include continued psychotherapy, and restitution (see Penal Law, § 65.10, subd 2, par [f]), and (2) for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed February 6, 1978, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender, upon resentence, the sentence being a term of imprisonment of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to probation for a period of five years. The case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, (1) to fix the terms and conditions of probation, which shall include continued psychotherapy, and restitution (see Penal Law, § 65.10, subd 2, par [f]), and (2) for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 956, 418 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mark-l-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack