People v. Mario R.

106 A.D.2d 589, 483 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21888

This text of 106 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Mario R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mario R., 106 A.D.2d 589, 483 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Brennan, J.), rendered May 3, 1983, adjudicating him a youthful offender following his [590]*590conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant has failed to raise the claimed inadequacy of his plea allocution at Criminal Term. Therefore, he has failed to preserve his claim for appellate review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857; People v McKenzie, 88 AD2d 646). O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pascale
401 N.E.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. McKenzie
88 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Santiago
100 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.2d 589, 483 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mario-r-nyappdiv-1984.