People v. Marini

2019 NY Slip Op 2928
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2019
Docket109734
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2928 (People v. Marini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Marini, 2019 NY Slip Op 2928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Marini (2019 NY Slip Op 02928)
People v Marini
2019 NY Slip Op 02928
Decided on April 18, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 18, 2019

109734

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

BRETT T. MARINI, Appellant.


Calendar Date: March 15, 2019
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Joseph A. Frandino of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered July 28, 2017, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with attempted criminal possession of a weapon the third degree. He pleaded guilty to this crime and waived his right to appeal, both orally and in writing. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to 1½ to 3 years in prison. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Consequently, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marini-nyappdiv-2019.