People v. Marin

7 A.D.3d 814, 776 N.Y.S.2d 888

Opinion

Appeal by the defen[815] dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and robbery in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding alleged errors that were committed at trial are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Griffin, 246 AD2d 668 [1998]; People v Saladana, 208 AD2d 872 [1994]). In any event, any alleged errors were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969 [1982]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J.E, Krausman, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marin, 7 A.D.3d 814, 776 N.Y.S.2d 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 814 (People v. Marin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
443 N.E.2d 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Saladana
208 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Griffin
246 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)