People v. Mariano

268 A.D.2d 671, 701 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 235

This text of 268 A.D.2d 671 (People v. Mariano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mariano, 268 A.D.2d 671, 701 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (McGill, J.), rendered September 5, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of three counts of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

On September 5, 1997, defendant entered a plea of guilty to three counts of burglary in the second degree and was, thereafter, sentenced as a second violent felony offender to concurrent determinate prison terms of 10 years on each count.

Defendant does not challenge the severity of his sentence but rather that the underlying reference to defendant as a [672]*672second violent felony offender was erroneous. We agree. Although defendant did not raise this issue prior to sentencing, it appears that he was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender based upon a conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, which occurred approximately 10 months after the commission of the burglaries. Consequently, this criminal possession of stolen property conviction could not form the basis for sentencing defendant as a second violent felony offender, since it is not a sentence for a violent crime committed before the commission of the present felony (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [1] [b] [ii]). Accordingly, defendant is entitled to be resentenced (see, People v Hunt, 148 AD2d 836, lv denied 74 NY2d 665). The judgment of conviction must, therefore, be modified by vacating the sentence imposed and the matter remitted to County Court for defendant’s resentencing.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Clinton County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hunt
148 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 671, 701 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mariano-nyappdiv-2000.