People v. Marcus

228 A.D.2d 702, 644 N.Y.2d 975, 644 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7377
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a charge of manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant (see, People v Martin, 59 NY2d 704), there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would have supported a charge of reckless manslaughter (see, e.g., People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61; People v Barden, 194 AD2d 548; People v Bloomfield, 187 AD2d 518; People v Stanley, 185 AD2d 827).

We have considered the defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marcus, 228 A.D.2d 702, 644 N.Y.2d 975, 644 N.Y.S.2d 975, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 702 (People v. Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Greene
282 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Marcus
255 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)