People v. Marco

30 A.D.2d 919, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293

Opinion

Motion to relieve counsel denied without prejudice to renew the motion at a later date on proper papers which comply with the requirements of Anders v. California (386 U. S. 738) and United States v. Camodeo (367 F. 2d 146). Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Capozzoli, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marco, 30 A.D.2d 919, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 919 (People v. Marco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Nicholas Camodeo
367 F.2d 146 (Second Circuit, 1966)