People v. Marciante
This text of 167 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Marciante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the prosecutor violated the terms of the plea bargain by making a sentencing recommendation, has not been preserved for our review because defendant did not object to the prosecutor’s remarks at the sentencing (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stripling, 136 AD2d 772, 773). We decline to exercise our discretion to review this issue in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]). Finally, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.—attempted assault, first degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D.2d 978, 562 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marciante-nyappdiv-1990.