People v. Marchese

224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1466
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 341 (People v. Marchese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Marchese, 224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered December 10, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 61/2 to 13 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of 5 to 10 years, and otherwise affirmed.

[342]*342In this "buy and bust” case, there was extensive cross-examination of the police concerning their failure to use various additional investigative techniques. Accordingly, in charging the jury that they should "not consider or speculate about” what other investigative techniques might have been used, the word "consider” was inappropriate. However, this did not render the court’s reasonable doubt instruction reversible error since the quoted language properly focused on the prohibition against juror speculation, and the instruction otherwise adequately conveyed the principle that a reasonable doubt can arise from a "lack of evidence” (compare, People v Duncan, 221 AD2d 254, with People v Rodriguez, 141 AD2d 382). In any event, given the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any error was harmless (People v Roldos, 161 AD2d 610, lv denied 76 NY2d 864).

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
10 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Cato
5 A.D.3d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Ali
301 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Tran
188 Misc. 2d 717 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
People v. Lilly
264 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marchese-nyappdiv-1996.