People v. Maragh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maragh

208 A.D.2d 563, 617 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9296

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 1994·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered July 2, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that he was denied his right to counsel at his sentencing because, when he moved to withdraw his guilty plea, the defense counsel took an adverse position to his motion. The record indicates, firstly, that the defense counsel supported the defendant’s motion and did not take an adverse position (cf., People v Rozzell, 20 NY2d 712, 713; People v Santana, 156 AD2d 736), and, secondly, that the court denied the defendant’s motion before the defense counsel made his statements. Thus, the sentencing court made its determination based upon the record before it and not upon [564] the defense counsel’s statements (see, People v Rodriguez, 189 AD2d 684, 685; People v Sutton, 39 AD2d 820). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered July 2, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that he was denied his right to counsel at his sentencing because, when he moved to withdraw his guilty plea, the defense counsel took an adverse position to his motion. The record indicates, firstly, that the defense counsel supported the defendant’s motion and did not take an adverse position (cf., People v Rozzell, 20 NY2d 712, 713; People v Santana, 156 AD2d 736), and, secondly, that the court denied the defendant’s motion before the defense counsel made his statements. Thus, the sentencing court made its determination based upon the record before it and not upon [564] the defense counsel’s statements (see, People v Rodriguez, 189 AD2d 684, 685; People v Sutton, 39 AD2d 820). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Maragh, 208 A.D.2d 563, 617 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 563 (People v. Maragh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related