People v. Manyam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Manyam

182 A.D.2d 712, 585 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A.D.2d 712 (People v. Manyam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Manyam, 182 A.D.2d 712, 585 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting her of conspiracy in the fourth degree, and attempted grand larceny in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

[713]*713Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

Additionally, we find that the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), rendered December 17, 1990, convicting her of conspiracy in the fourth degree, and attempted grand larceny in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

[713]*713Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

Additionally, we find that the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 712, 585 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manyam-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack