People v. Manuel

171 A.D.2d 1012, 579 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Manuel. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 711

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree. The cashier testified that she gave defendant the money out of the cash register after defendant threatened her and her husband. This established that defendant stole property from [1013]*1013the person of another (see, Penal Law § 155.30 [5]; People v Cunningham, 73 AD2d 976). (Appeal from judgment of Wayne County Court, Parent!, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lowery and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Manuel, 171 A.D.2d 1012, 579 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 1012 (People v. Manuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cunningham
73 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)