People v. Manso

158 N.Y.S.3d 733, 202 A.D.3d 1509, 2022 NY Slip Op 00799
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 2022
Docket1145 KA 19-00698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 N.Y.S.3d 733 (People v. Manso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Manso, 158 N.Y.S.3d 733, 202 A.D.3d 1509, 2022 NY Slip Op 00799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Manso (2022 NY Slip Op 00799)
People v Manso
2022 NY Slip Op 00799
Decided on February 4, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

1145 KA 19-00698

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ELUID MANSO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered January 29, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.39 [1]), defendant contends that he did not validly waive his right to appeal and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Hemphill, 192 AD3d 1479, 1480 [4th Dept 2021]; People v Alls, 187 AD3d 1515, 1515 [4th Dept 2020]; People v Love, 181 AD3d 1193, 1193 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 4, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Favors
2024 NY Slip Op 04026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 N.Y.S.3d 733, 202 A.D.3d 1509, 2022 NY Slip Op 00799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manso-nyappdiv-2022.