People v. Mansell

79 A.D.2d 582, 434 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 79 A.D.2d 582 (People v. Mansell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mansell, 79 A.D.2d 582, 434 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered June 29, 1979, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (former Penal Law, § 220.21) and imposing an indeterminate sentence of from two years to life, modified, on the law, to vacate the sentence, the ease remanded for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed. The sentencing of defendant convicted of an A-I felony to an indeterminate prison term of from two years to life imprisonment violated section 70.00 (subd 3, par [a], cl [1]) of the Penal Law, which was then applicable and required a minimum period of not less than 15 years. This is not the rare case on its particular facts which might justify finding that the applicable sentencing provision was unconstitutional as applied to this defendant. However, we note that within three months of the sentence, the law was changed so that the weight requirement for an A-I felony was increased from 2 to 4 ounces and the mandatory minimum for an A-II felony (the category into which defendant would then fall in that he possessed approximately 2.7 ounces) was lowered to three years. Under these circumstances, and in light of the sentiment expressed by the sentencing court, we note that upon being resentenced, defendant as one incarcerated under an A-I narcotic sentence may seek executive clemency from the harsh sentencing consequences operating herein (see Hechtman, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law, § 60.09, Cumulative Annual Pocket Part, p 56). Concur—Sullivan, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thompson
190 A.D.2d 162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Clark
176 A.D.2d 1206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Terrell
111 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Garcia
99 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Royster
117 Misc. 2d 112 (New York County Courts, 1982)
People v. Donovan
89 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.2d 582, 434 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mansell-nyappdiv-1980.