People v. Manning
This text of 286 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 2, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is afiirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review as he raised no objections and did not advance any arguments at the hearing (see, People v Taylor, 253 AD2d 471).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 690, 729 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manning-nyappdiv-2001.