People v. Manning

286 A.D.2d 690, 729 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 10, 2001·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 2, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is afiirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review as he raised no objections and did not advance any arguments at the hearing (see, People v Taylor, 253 AD2d 471).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Manning, 286 A.D.2d 690, 729 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ALLEN, WILLIAM, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Allen
120 A.D.3d 1595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Broadus
8 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)