People v. Manning

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Manning

34 Mich. App. 700

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1971

DocketDocket Nos. 9560, 9561

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Mich. App. 700 (People v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Manning, 34 Mich. App. 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants were jointly tried on a two-count information charging larceny in a building, MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592), and opening or attempting to open a coin box or receptacle, MCLA § 750.113 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.308). They were convicted on both counts and were sentenced. Their briefs on appeal have been filed and the people have filed motions to affirm.

A review of the briefs and the trial court record make it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendants were jointly tried on a two-count information charging larceny in a building, MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592), and opening or attempting to open a coin box or receptacle, MCLA § 750.113 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.308). They were convicted on both counts and were sentenced. Their briefs on appeal have been filed and the people have filed motions to affirm.

A review of the briefs and the trial court record make it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Mich. App. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manning-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack