People v. Manley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Manley

293 A.D.2d 628, 740 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Manley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Manley, 293 A.D.2d 628, 740 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered January 4, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court should have instructed the jury that evidence of guilt as to one criminal incident could not be considered evidence of guilt as to the other incident charged in the indictment (see People v Robbins, 239 AD2d 526; see also People v Davis, 195 AD2d 605; People v Lewis, 175 AD2d 885; CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered January 4, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court should have instructed the jury that evidence of guilt as to one criminal incident could not be considered evidence of guilt as to the other incident charged in the indictment (see People v Robbins, 239 AD2d 526; see also People v Davis, 195 AD2d 605; People v Lewis, 175 AD2d 885; CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 628, 740 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manley-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack