People v. Maniscalco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maniscalco

255 A.D. 942, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5924

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Memorandum: A question of fact was presented in this case and we are of the opinion that the verdict is supported by the evidence to the extent required in a criminal case. We have examined the record for errors of fact and law and we find none of sufficient importance to require a reversal. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of attempt to commit extortion.) Present —• Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Memorandum: A question of fact was presented in this case and we are of the opinion that the verdict is supported by the evidence to the extent required in a criminal case. We have examined the record for errors of fact and law and we find none of sufficient importance to require a reversal. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of attempt to commit extortion.) Present —• Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

People v. Maniscalco, 255 A.D. 942, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 942 (People v. Maniscalco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.