People v. Manigiaruga
This text of 115 A.D.2d 623 (People v. Manigiaruga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarese, J.), rendered December 22, 1981, convicting him of criminal trespass in the third degree, grand larceny in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant failed to object to the prosecutor’s comments on summation, and therefore his contentions have not been pre[624]*624served for review (see, People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818). In any event, the one or two remarks made by the prosecutor, even if improper, were insufficient to deny defendant a fair trial in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 623, 496 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manigiaruga-nyappdiv-1985.