People v. Manigault

297 A.D.2d 754, 747 N.Y.2d 787, 747 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 754 (People v. Manigault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Manigault, 297 A.D.2d 754, 747 N.Y.2d 787, 747 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court’s examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor’s summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court’s questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Townsend
70 A.D.3d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Manigault
308 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 754, 747 N.Y.2d 787, 747 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manigault-nyappdiv-2002.