People v. Manigault
297 A.D.2d 754, 747 N.Y.2d 787, 747 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court’s examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor’s summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court’s questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Manigault, 297 A.D.2d 754, 747 N.Y.2d 787, 747 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 754 (People v. Manigault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Townsend
70 A.D.3d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Manigault
308 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)