People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance

59 N.Y.S. 1007
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 18, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 N.Y.S. 1007 (People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance, 59 N.Y.S. 1007 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

LAWBENOE, J.

I am of the opinion that the report of the referee in this case should be confirmed, and the exceptions taken thereto overruled. The status of the corporation as to its liability for [1008]*1008taxation became fixed on the second Monday of January, 1888. People v. Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments, 91 N. Y. 602; Sisters, of Poor of St. Francis v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 112 N. Y. 677, 20 N. E. 417; Id., 51 Hun, 355, 3 N. Y. Supp. 433; McMahon v. Beekman, 65 How. Prac. 427. The corporation having failed to avail itself of the remedies prescribed by law in cases of illegal assessments for taxation, it is now too late to question either the quantum or the validity of the tax. People v. Wall St. Bank, 39 Hun, 528, 529, and cases cited. In that case Davis, P. J., delivering the opinion of the court, says:

“The law Is thoroughly well settled in this state that the proceedings of the commissioners of taxes and assessments in making assessments for the purposes of taxation, and of the city authorities in levying taxes based on such assessments, are judicial in their nature, and can only be reviewed or questioned in courts by writs of certiorari prosecuted by the parties aggrieved or affected.”

See, also, In re McLean (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 230; In re Columbian Ins. Co., 3 Abb. Dec. 239.

The case of Central Trust Co. v. New York City & N. R. Co., 110 N. Y. 250, 18 N. E. 92, is a direct authority for the application which is made in this instance, and, inasmuch as the state is entitled to preference over individuals, the creditors of the insolvent corporation have no reason to complain if the debt created by the assessment and tax is directed to be paid.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

InrRe Otto Freund Arnold Yeast Co.
178 F. 305 (E.D. New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.Y.S. 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-manhattan-fire-insurance-nysupct-1890.