People v. Mandell

50 A.D.2d 907, 377 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11818
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 907 (People v. Mandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mandell, 50 A.D.2d 907, 377 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, each rendered March 26, 1975, upon guilty pleas, the first (under Indictment No. 7390/73) convicting him of bribery and sentencing him to a term of intermittent imprisonment for six months, and the second (under Indictment No. 3787/74) convicting him of bribe receiving and sentencing him to five years’ probation, with one of the conditions being that defendant provide volunteer services for the Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases Foundation. Judgment under Indictment No. 7390/73 affirmed. Judgment under Indictment No. 3787/74 modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the probation condition that defendant provide volunteer services for the Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases Foundation. As so modified, judgment affirmed. It appears that, prior to sentence, defendant volunteered for service with the Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases Foundation and on this appeal he does not question the propriety of that condition of his probation. There is no authority in law for mandating such service as a condition of probation (Penal Law, § 65.10). Therefore, on this court’s own motion, the condition of such volunteer service must be stricken. However, defendant’s continuance of such service on his own initiative will undoubtedly inure to his benefit vis-a-vis his conduct evaluation by the probation department. We have examined all of appellant’s contentions with respect to both judgments and the sentences imposed therein and, other than the above modification, we find no basis for disturbing either the convictions or the sentences. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Chaitin
94 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1979
People v. Davis
67 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Jett v. Leverette
247 S.E.2d 469 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 907, 377 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mandell-nyappdiv-1975.