People v. Mandal

California Court of Appeal

People v. Mandal

25 Cal. App. 629

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 27, 1914

DocketCrim. No. 264

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cal. App. 629 (People v. Mandal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mandal, 25 Cal. App. 629 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

BURNETT, J.

On this appeal we have not been favored with any argument, oral or written. Nevertheless, we have examined the record and we find that defendant was properly charged with the offense designated in the statute as “pimping,” that sufficient evidence of his guilt was received and that no prejudicial error was committed during the trial. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURNETT, J.

On this appeal we have not been favored with any argument, oral or written. Nevertheless, we have examined the record and we find that defendant was properly charged with the offense designated in the statute as “pimping,” that sufficient evidence of his guilt was received and that no prejudicial error was committed during the trial. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.

Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Cal. App. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mandal-calctapp-1914.