People v. Mancini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mancini

26 A.D.2d 653, 272 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3711

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 653 (People v. Mancini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mancini, 26 A.D.2d 653, 272 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coro.ni nobis proceeding, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 19, 1965, which after a Huntley type hearing, denied their application to vacate judgments of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered January 9, 1957, convicting them of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree and assault in the second degree and imposing sentence. The judgments were affirmed (People v. Mancini, 7 A D 2d 640, affd. 6 N Y 2d 853; People v. Romano, 7 A D 2d 640, affd. 6 N Y 2d 853). Order reversed, on the law, and application remitted to the trial court for a hearing de novo in accordance with People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72). The procedure prescribed in People v. Korda (24 A D 2d 577) should be followed. No questions of fact have been considered. It was error to refuse to make a finding and determination thereon with respect to the proof to the effect that defendants had requested counsel and such requests were denied prior to their making of the inculpatory statements (People v. Sanchez, 15 N Y 2d 387; People v. Taylor, 16 N Y 2d 1038; [654]*654People v. Black, 25 A D 2d 663). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coro.ni nobis proceeding, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 19, 1965, which after a Huntley type hearing, denied their application to vacate judgments of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered January 9, 1957, convicting them of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree and assault in the second degree and imposing sentence. The judgments were affirmed (People v. Mancini, 7 A D 2d 640, affd. 6 N Y 2d 853; People v. Romano, 7 A D 2d 640, affd. 6 N Y 2d 853). Order reversed, on the law, and application remitted to the trial court for a hearing de novo in accordance with People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72). The procedure prescribed in People v. Korda (24 A D 2d 577) should be followed. No questions of fact have been considered. It was error to refuse to make a finding and determination thereon with respect to the proof to the effect that defendants had requested counsel and such requests were denied prior to their making of the inculpatory statements (People v. Sanchez, 15 N Y 2d 387; People v. Taylor, 16 N Y 2d 1038; [654]*654People v. Black, 25 A D 2d 663). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ,, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 653, 272 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mancini-nyappdiv-1966.