People v. Mance

269 A.D.2d 188, 703 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1137
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered June 11, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 22 years to life, 71/2 to 15 years and 3x/2 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

To the extent that defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim rests on factual assertions contained in his unsuccessful CPL 440.10 motion, those assertions are not properly before this Court because leave to appeal was denied (see, People v Williams, 266 AD2d 97). On the totality of the existing record, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). Trial counsel’s failure to move for dismissal of the indictment based on preindictment delay does not require a finding of ineffectiveness, since defendant has not established that such a motion had any likelihood of success (see, People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). While the delay was lengthy, the crime was extremely serious, defendant was not incarcerated on this charge during the period in question, and there is no evidence of bad faith or prejudice. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Lerner and Andrias. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mance, 269 A.D.2d 188, 703 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 188 (People v. Mance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
2025 NY Slip Op 05016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Webb
2004 NY Slip Op 50429(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)